In the legal world, the "public prosecutor's office" is called the "honorable adversary" because it is the party that represents the community or so-called public law in criminal acts, and its task, entrusted by society, is to investigate these crimes, identify the perpetrators, and indict them.

However, this has not been the case with the prosecution and its Attorney General Ahmed Rashid Al-Dhanhani, who during his tenure transformed the role of the prosecution from a guardian of justice to a guardian for the perpetrators. It, now, covers arbitrary arrests by the state security apparatus.

Al-Dhanhani's professional career began in Al Ain, where he worked in the Municipality or Traffic Prosecution, prosecuting traffic and sanitation violations. In 2009, Al-Dhanhani's career took a big leap that was not consistent with his modest career when he was appointed advisor to the head of the Abu Dhabi Public Prosecution, in addition to his role as acting head of the State Security Prosecution.

It appears that Al-Dhanhani was assigned to the prosecution's work for two reasons. First, Al-Dhanhani does not meet the necessary requirements to become the head of the prosecutor's office because the law requires that the head of the prosecutor's office has served as an agent of the prosecutor's office for a certain period of time and then as the head of one of the prosecutor's offices before being allowed to assume this position. Second, UAE authorities wanted to be sure of Al- Dhanhani loyalty before giving him such an important position, which Al- Dhanhani demonstrated in the "UAE 94" case and subsequent cases involving detainees of conscience

Therefore, a few months after the beginning of the "UAE 94" case, Al-Dhanhani was confirmed as the head of the prosecution, apparently as a reward for his cover-up of the human rights violations and their perpetrators, and later he was promoted to the position of prosecutor general of the prosecution, which is the highest position on the career ladder of the prosecution.

As the acting prosecutor for state security, Al-Dhanhani brought all the defendants in the "UAE 94" case to him, and he was responsible for investigating them when they were brought before the prosecution after their long detention in state security prisons.

During this period, Al-Dhanhani oversaw systematic violations, played an important role in extorting confessions from detainees, fabricated charges against them, and transformed the prosecution from a guardian of justice into a supervisor of the largest arbitrary arrests and torture in UAE history.

Although the origin of the prosecution is to treat the defendants according to the presumption of innocence and as fair opponents, Al-Dhanhani was eager to catch the defendants in the "UAE 94" case and treat them as criminals who were proven guilty, and when one of the defendants claimed innocence, he questioned it and said if you were innocent, you would not have been brought here!!!! In the first phase, Al-Dhanhani's main role was to prolong the detention of the defendants and conceal their legally arbitrary detention until they were handed over to justice. He prolonged the detention even without their presence.

In the second phase, Al-Dhanhani's task was to trap the defendants by any means, be it threats, lies or even forgeries, and to make them confess until he put them on trial. For example, in the case of the detainee Maryam Al-Balushi, Al-Dhanhani deceived Maryam that the maximum sentence he had received was six months and that she would not be imprisoned in Al-Wathba Prison due to its poor detention conditions and her young age. “There are massacres in, may God help us, you are so young, so we will not leave you with them”, and he forced her to sign the investigation papers without allowing her to read the papers, after which Maryam was transferred to Al-Wathba prison and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.

Specifically in the "UAE 94" case, Al-Dhanhani forced numerous defendants to sign confessions without giving them the opportunity to review them and know their co ntents, and he continued to refuse to hand over the trial papers to the defendants even though the trial had already started.

In addition, Al-Dhanhani falsified the investigation protocols, changed the statements of the defendants, and added new evidence that was not available when the suspect was searched or questioned. An example of this is the case of detainee of conscience Abd al-Salam Darwish.

During the trial, Darwish stated that he signed the investigation papers without reading them because he was extremely exhausted and tortured. However, he later discovered that Al-Dhanhani had changed his statements and wrote in the investigation report that he had admitted that the Al-Hiwar TV was spreading the organization's ideology.

After Al-Dhanhani forced the defendants to sign confessions or lie to them, ignoring all the violations that took place during the investigation process before their appearance in court and falsifying their statements in the files, he appeared before the judge as the representative of the prosecution to say, "They love only themselves and have turned against the motherland and sought help in foreign countries."

Al-Dhanhani transformed the prosecution from a representative of the people into a representative of a group of people, and he transformed it from a guardian of the law into a violator of it, and he practiced everything that is permissible and not permissible according to the law until he convicted the defendants, then he began to accuse them with a flood of accusations.